Showing posts with label Posted by Cordell T. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Posted by Cordell T. Show all posts

Tuesday, April 24, 2018

Darwinism in Literat- Oh wait, no, that's not quite what this is.

When I did literary analysis in the past, it always revolved around a couple distinct things: character, plot, theme, figurative language, and symbolism. That's it. I honestly had no idea what "new criticism" "Marxism" or "structuralism" meant. Although I undoubtedly used some of those approaches in past analysis, it's not the same thing as truly knowing them. Perhaps this is a crude comparison, but it's like the difference between knowing how to throw a punch in a fight and knowing exactly ho to hit someone to knock them out. In the first scenario, you can fight, sure, and you can perhaps get a knock out because in general you know to throw punches at people's heads, but in the second scenario you're going to fare much better because you know exactly where in the head to hit, how hard, and how to create appropriate openings in order to get there. It's all about refinement and knowledge of technique. This is like making an analysis because now I know more than a general "this is what you do to write a literary analysis". Now I know how to look at how the specific plot structure synthesizes with the metaphors and diction to create meaning. Now I know to look for tropes that combine with the setting to add emphasis to particular points.

This is how my literary analysis has evolved. I also learned a great deal about reader-response-ism. I felt like most of what we did in class focused on this type of literary criticism, and I think it is the most important, because, in the end, it doesn't matter how a piece of literature was intended or crafted, it matters how it was received (I don't mean favorably/unfavorably, I mean the definition of reader-response. How it makes us feel, think, etc.). I am learning to synthesize all these different types of analysis into one great whole. I did this the best on my Literary Analysis essay, where I was able to successfully synthesize many aspects of the story "A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings", such as title, setting, plot structure, diction, and tropes, character, extended metaphors, and symbols, to produce a viable argument for what I thought the piece meant. The Personal Literary Essay was also helpful, but more in reading other pieces than making my own, and seeing how others were able to successfully capture the true purpose of literature in their own analysis of how it affected them. 

I'd say that from now on my way of analyzing literature is changed. I am more skilled and have more tools on my belt than ever before, and that's going to be a gift that keeps on giving.   

Links, for those who are interested, to the most influential analysis for me:

Thursday, April 19, 2018

A Very Old Man with Enormous Wings: A Very Strange Tale Most Definitely Not for Children

I am analyzing Gabriel Garcia Marquez's short story "A Very Old Man With Enormous Wings: A Tale for Children".

Thesis/Intro:
This is a story about an old man with vulture's wings who appears in a small village off the coast sometime in the mid 20th century. It is a story about how the people of this small town assume that he is an angel and that he can perform miracles, and how they use him. My working thesis on the paper is this: "Though Marquez claims that this is a story for children, it is really a story about the absurdity of human nature, and is quite unfit in various ways for a child audience." I think this is true, although I am unsure because he may just be giving it that title to fool with people.

Section one:
So this part of the paper i explain the story and it's interpretation. basically, each person in the story represents a distinct form of human absurdity, and i will show this through a character and plot analysis.

Section 2:
Just having some character analysis wont be enough. so i will also delve into how the old man is actually a metaphor for Jesus Christ in the story, and how it parallels how people treated him. this will further support my thesis. This is the town reaction, on my paper, because they are the ones who give the biggest impression of this link between the old man and Christ.

Section 3:
Now I need to delve even deeper. lets talk about the story structure, how the symbols (like the wings, a typical symbol of power, are given to a weak old man), contrasts, and everything else sets up a greater structure that mirrors human absurdity.


On the Beauty of Poetry and it’s Overall Importance

Annotations of Ars Poetica by Archibald MacLeish

Claims:
Policy: Archibald Macleish’s poem should not be read literally, as most of it is metaphoric.
Definition: The poem is saying that although to have meaning is important, a poem cannot transcend unless it is beautiful too.
Comparison: The unorthodox structure of the poem is like how poetry should feel to us: unique and timeless.
Evaluation: It is good for us to give poetry meaning, but it should be beautiful too.
Casual: Reading the poem figuratively evokes many beautiful images that are unstated about what poetry truly is.

Ars Poetica: Poems shouldn't mean anything at all!

8 Steps to Follow and Questions to Ask

Ars Poetica by Archibald Macleish
1. Listening or reading the poem out loud without over-analyzing is a great way to start!

A poem should be palpable and mute 
As a globed fruit, 

Dumb
As old medallions to the thumb,

Silent as the sleeve-worn stone
Of casement ledges where the moss has grown- 

A poem should be wordless
As the flight of birds.

A poem should be motionless in time
As the moon climbs.

Leaving, as the moon releases
Twig by twig the night-entangled trees, 

Leaving, as the moon behind winter leaves,
Memory by memory the mind- 

A poem should be motionless in time
As the moon climbs

A poem should be equal to:
Not true.

For all the history of grief
An empty doorway and a maple leaf.

For love
The leaning grasses and two lights above the sea-

A poem should not mean
But be. 

2. Articulating expectations for the poem allows the reader to go into detail about how, where, or when the poem frustrates or fulfills your expectations 
The title suggests to me that the poem will be about poetry itself, although I don’t really know what an Ars Poetica is, it seems to me to suggest some kind of list or description. Indeed, the poem details what a poem should be in ideal terms. 

3. Analyzing the syntax of a poem allows the reader to truly understand what is being said. 
The author uses plenty of metaphors and figurative language, and uses interesting stanza structure, where each thought is broken into two lines and one stanza, the first line being almost always shorter than the second. This creates an added emphasis to the more important thoughts.

4. Consulting reference works for anything the poemmay mention that you do not understand.
Ars Poetica means  a poem that explains the "art of poetry" or a meditation on poetry using forms and techniques of a poem, etc.

5. Understanding who, where, when, and what happens is easier after you've come to a literal understanding of each sentence.
Who: Nobody but the reader and the author
Where: No particular location
When: No time frame is given, except to say that this poem (and all poetry that's good) is essentially timeless.
What: a description of what poetry really is, it's most important and complex attributes, what makes it special.

6. Addressing those questions allows us to ponder the bigger picture questions such as why does the poem matter and what does it mean?
The poem is important because it displays an authors view on what poetry really is. it is interesting because the poem says that a poem should not mean anything, but that it should be. I think, paradoxically, that this poem does mean something, and that is that all poetry should transcend meaning, because it should also be a work of art, and just as art is hollow without purpose, it is also not art without beauty.

7. How does the form of the poem contribute to it's effect and meaning?
The most powerful part of the poem to me is the ninth stanza because of how the lines in the individual stanzas are weighted. Normally, the first line is shorter than the last one, or of comparable length. But in this stanza that order is reversed, which adds a punch to the line: Not true. This is powerful stuff because it accentuates that poetry isn't as simple and math and other parts of the world, it is abstract and detailed and flexible and can be many things at once without equaling anything at all.

8. Consider the ways in which the poem both uses and departs from poetic conventions, especially those related to form and sub-genre. 
The poem doesn't have a regular meter that is the same length for every line. it changes, even though there is a pattern. Yet the poem does adhere to a rather strict rhyme scheme, giving it some form of structure. The punctuation is a tad different than normal, with long, drawn out sentences mostly comprising of commas and such to showcase the winding and rhythmic pace of poetry in general.




On the Other Hand... Maybe Darkness Is Just too Boring

In my other post about this clip of Hamlet, I discussed how the darkness of the stage and the general lack of props can enhance the viewers experience by focusing all attention on Hamlet himself as he gives his crucial soliloquy. But, on the. Other hand, the darkness of the stage and the lack of good props and symbols could be detracting from the overall performance. Cumberbatch is a phenomenal actor, and he certainly delivers a moving performance, however that’s not to say that it couldn’t be improved were the atmosphere to include more symbolism, more than just a noose in a dark room. Either way, his performance is fantastic. But just like how apples are great alone yet many people consider them to be even better with peanut butter, this play could maybe use a bit more extravagance in the stage.

Benedict Cumberbatch in Hamlet

The production ofHamlet in which stars Benedict Cumberbatch is incredibly interesting, and not only because he is an excellent actor. The lighting of the stage is very focused: all is dark except Hamlet himself. This is interesting because in most productions of Hamlet that I have seen, there arre other things on stage, objects that are themes and symbols. In this case all is focused on him, and the noose that he has tethered about his neck. This, combined with the darkness of the stage, lends a certain power and focus to the play that is not present in many other renditions. Watching, you can see how the darkness of the stage not only lends these qualities, but also an increase in tension, as the darkness is somewhat symbolic of the death and unknown that Hamletis wrestling with in this moment. What an excellent production!

Monday, March 19, 2018

Appearances and Redemption



Aragorn's appearance isn't much, but he sure is a lot more than he appears.


I cannot say that I have ever read a piece of poetry that truly changed me in one distinct moment. I do have a deep love for literature, however, most of that is made up by a conglomerate of stories that i have read or were read to me by my mother. My deepest affection for literature lies with the fantastical, the wonderfully unreal; the things so different and so amazing, that they become completely foreign to this life, like visiting another world. It should come as no surprise, then, that the most personally moving work of poetry that I have ever read wasn’t written by Robert Frost or William Shakespeare, but by J.R.R. Tolkien.

Friday, February 2, 2018

Log Cabins and Bullet Holes

This story is very engaging, particularly the parts where Leroy talks about the log cabin, and its symbolism. The log cabin obviously represents their marriage. After Leroy gets home from his accident, spends all his time at home, no longer working, he begins to feel the rift between him and Norma Jean. Feeling them fall farther and farther apart, he decides that he should build her a log cabin, a real house where she can live, because they’ve never had one. But this cabin is somewhat symbolic of their marriage. It is not an accident that Norma was conceived in Shiloh, and that Shiloh is the only location of a real log cabin in the story. The log cabin in Shiloh represents the state of their lives together, and they are both riddled with bullet holes. For Leroy and Norma Jean, those holes come primarily from the loss of their baby. The cabin of their marriage started to erode even then, but it hasn’t stopped. So for Leroy to offer to Norma Jean a log cabin, to get a “clean slate” for their marriage is exactly not what she wants, because even though the slate may be clean, it is is still a slate, and not a sheet of paper, like what all the people are using no days (the new houses and subdivisions, where a log cabin would feel out of place.). Leroy finally realizes this, however he is too late. It happens at the very end of the story, and he knows that to keep her around, he must instead build something spectacular, something incredible. And he must come up with what that is quickly. Because after what happened to their first log-cabin-marriage, Norma Jean wont settle for another one. She has already put herself on the path to differentiate herself from the log cabins. She’s becoming a fitness guru, educated, and all in all current with the times, while Leroy is stuck in the past with his log cabins. If he wants to keep her, his house had better be a modern one, and not some outdated junk made from log. Even Mable said: “You couldn’t get me to live in a log cabin. I grew up in one, and they are NOT comfortable.”

Putting Chaos in His Place